10. Arguably poor taste, but I take that it has to be declared a No to uphold free speech
11. Borderline
12. Borderline
13. No (self-defense)
14. Morally, no (also self-defense)
15. Functionally, no (also self-defense)
16. No (self-defense, if he gets the hint)
17. YES YES YES
18. Borderline but I'll take it as a Yes
19. No (self-defense)
20. No (self-defense), but still iffy as there's a slight risk your fans will also use their created weapons on another innocent person, or share the instructions
21. As above
22. Functionally, yes given that you're letting millions of other people die to save yourself (not that I'd blame you 😛)
23. Only if the cult becomes murderous, but you can't control that so I suppose it's a No
24. Not really
25. It's illegal and willful, so Yes
26. Willfully negligent, so Yes
27. Legally yes, but it may save patients later so I can still sympathize with him
28. You're saving more lives than you're ending, so No
29. No, if it works correctly; but you're braver than I am to count on that 😪
Your responses indicate that when the reward is implied rather than promised, you don't consider stochastic violence to be murder. You also believe that self-defense always excuses violence, except in the case of truly massive collateral damage. The fact that your answers are entirely consistent with the moral principles you value and do not change depending on the identity of the perpetrator or victim strongly suggests that you are NOT an NPC. Congratulations!
I would say that the vast majority of people agree with your responses (and I do too).
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Borderline
5. Yes
6. Yes
7. Yes
8. Borderline
9. Borderline, but probably legal
10. Arguably poor taste, but I take that it has to be declared a No to uphold free speech
11. Borderline
12. Borderline
13. No (self-defense)
14. Morally, no (also self-defense)
15. Functionally, no (also self-defense)
16. No (self-defense, if he gets the hint)
17. YES YES YES
18. Borderline but I'll take it as a Yes
19. No (self-defense)
20. No (self-defense), but still iffy as there's a slight risk your fans will also use their created weapons on another innocent person, or share the instructions
21. As above
22. Functionally, yes given that you're letting millions of other people die to save yourself (not that I'd blame you 😛)
23. Only if the cult becomes murderous, but you can't control that so I suppose it's a No
24. Not really
25. It's illegal and willful, so Yes
26. Willfully negligent, so Yes
27. Legally yes, but it may save patients later so I can still sympathize with him
28. You're saving more lives than you're ending, so No
29. No, if it works correctly; but you're braver than I am to count on that 😪
Your responses indicate that when the reward is implied rather than promised, you don't consider stochastic violence to be murder. You also believe that self-defense always excuses violence, except in the case of truly massive collateral damage. The fact that your answers are entirely consistent with the moral principles you value and do not change depending on the identity of the perpetrator or victim strongly suggests that you are NOT an NPC. Congratulations!
I would say that the vast majority of people agree with your responses (and I do too).