Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Keaton Halle's avatar

I've recently come to the conclusion that misandry is an inevitable end-stage of feminism as we know it – for reasons I won't delve deep into here, but the salient observation seems to be that most women want “equality” as long as only men have to make concessions to attain it.

For a start, why are most romance stories aimed specifically at girls, when most romance is between a girl and a boy? The exceptions (e.g. The Dangers in My Heart) are usually aimed predominantly at boys, and perceived as “too creepy” by girls. Of course the girl‑oriented majority are so airy‑fairy that I'll never possibly be interested in them; so it can only be the girls who ever concede there.

Perhaps only Aspergirls still deserve chivalry – in many ways they need even more protection from the dreadful influences of “normie” women, than they do from men. (If it actually works is another matter, though – I can't boast about any personal success there…)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts