4 Comments
Nov 20Liked by HumbleRando

I've recently come to the conclusion that misandry is an inevitable end-stage of feminism as we know it – for reasons I won't delve deep into here, but the salient observation seems to be that most women want “equality” as long as only men have to make concessions to attain it.

For a start, why are most romance stories aimed specifically at girls, when most romance is between a girl and a boy? The exceptions (e.g. The Dangers in My Heart) are usually aimed predominantly at boys, and perceived as “too creepy” by girls. Of course the girl‑oriented majority are so airy‑fairy that I'll never possibly be interested in them; so it can only be the girls who ever concede there.

Perhaps only Aspergirls still deserve chivalry – in many ways they need even more protection from the dreadful influences of “normie” women, than they do from men. (If it actually works is another matter, though – I can't boast about any personal success there…)

Expand full comment
author

Wasn't there an Aspergirl you were interested in a while back? Did you ever end up making a move?

Expand full comment

No response from her; the only consolation (maybe) so far is that my apology comes up quite high in search results for her nickname, and although predominantly an apology, there are some parts (for better or worse) about accountability for her own problems. It's hard to overstate how difficult things are when the one thing (law) she's formally qualified at is the one thing she sucks at (from what I can see), though…

Expand full comment
author

This is confusing: maybe you could send me the story in my DMs?

Expand full comment